The recent Supreme Court decisions expanding the scope of thedeath penalty reflects one of the more caustic ironies of thisrapidly evolving age of moral anarchy. In the majority of the courtdefending execution were those justices who are consistentlystringent in their opposition to abortion. In dissent were thosejustices who are most adamant in defense of a woman's supposed rightto kill a living being.
The court, shrouded in arcane legal reasoning, finds itselfdistracted by whether the death penalty is discriminatory or whetherthe public should fund abortions. Unfortunately, the court nowignores as resolved the basic issue of whether society has the rightto abort or …
No comments:
Post a Comment